Difference between revisions of "Buccoo (Q495351)"

From LOD Enslaved.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Added reference to claim: hasPlaceType (P8): Other Place Type (Q258), #quickstatements; batch #378 by User:Seila Gonzalez)
(‎Added reference to claim: hasDescription (P66): 1. Original grantees were J.Leith and Ch. Irvine, under Sandy Bay division (St Patrick parish) nos. 34, 351/2 and 39 (which became Buccoo), who were also shown as Present Proprietors in 1773. 'Present Possessor Lord Douglas' c. 1866. The owners in 1832 were shown as 'Douglas & Irvine'; the estate was still in culitvation in 1862., #quickstatements; batch #379 by User:Seila Gonzalez)
Property / hasDescription: 1. Original grantees were J.Leith and Ch. Irvine, under Sandy Bay division (St Patrick parish) nos. 34, 351/2 and 39 (which became Buccoo), who were also shown as Present Proprietors in 1773. 'Present Possessor Lord Douglas' c. 1866. The owners in 1832 were shown as 'Douglas & Irvine'; the estate was still in culitvation in 1862. / reference
 

Revision as of 18:05, 29 June 2020

LBS-PLA-EST-07041
  • LBS-PLA-EST-07041
  • LBS-PLA-EST-e3683
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Buccoo
LBS-PLA-EST-07041
  • LBS-PLA-EST-07041
  • LBS-PLA-EST-e3683

Statements

0 references
TT
0 references
1. Original grantees were J.Leith and Ch. Irvine, under Sandy Bay division (St Patrick parish) nos. 34, 351/2 and 39 (which became Buccoo), who were also shown as Present Proprietors in 1773. 'Present Possessor Lord Douglas' c. 1866. The owners in 1832 were shown as 'Douglas & Irvine'; the estate was still in culitvation in 1862.