Difference between revisions of "Holders Black Rock (Q492490)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added reference to claim: hasDescription (P66): ory is obscure. Hughes-Queree suggest that R. M. Smitten was the owner by 1825 but while the compensation claim was lodged by his Widow, Catherine Smitten, challenged by Brandon et al., the estate does not appear in the Slave Registers after 1817, where it was known as Black Rock, nor do the names of the enslaved in 1817 seem to be listed in relation to Smitten in any of the slave registers. James, #quickstatements; [[:toollabs:quickstatements/#/b...) |
(Removed claim: locatedIn (P7): North America (Q311), #quickstatements; batch #1040 by User:Alicia Sheill) |
||
| Property / locatedIn | |||
| Property / locatedIn: North America / rank | |||
Revision as of 17:25, 19 December 2022
LBS-PLA-EST-01399
- LBS-PLA-EST-01399
- LBS-PLA-EST-e727
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
Holders Black Rock
|
LBS-PLA-EST-01399
|
|
Statements
BB
0 references
Holders was also known as the Black Rock plantation. Between 1656 and 1680 it was owned by Timothy Thornhill. Subsequently it was acquired by the Hon William Holder who, in his will of 1706, left it to his son John Holder. He then left it in his will of 1725 to his son William Holder. Though there is some evidence of the estate being acquired by James Holder – see the evolutions – much of the hist
1 reference
ory is obscure. Hughes-Queree suggest that R. M. Smitten was the owner by 1825 but while the compensation claim was lodged by his Widow, Catherine Smitten, challenged by Brandon et al., the estate does not appear in the Slave Registers after 1817, where it was known as Black Rock, nor do the names of the enslaved in 1817 seem to be listed in relation to Smitten in any of the slave registers. James
1 reference
Holder also does not appear in a Register after 1817.
1 reference